Showing posts with label high calorie formula. Show all posts
Showing posts with label high calorie formula. Show all posts

Monday, January 14

Blended Diet

Wriggles gets near enough 100% of her nutrition and calories from formula; always has done. With a very slight window of exception, most of her life this has been formula carefully considered by paediatricians and medical professionals and one picked to carefully meet specific needs. We have been through a fair few in our time, found some we liked (as much as you can like commercially produced milk derived 'food') and some we really didn't. Picking a good formula was important with the tube. In some ways, it opened things up as dietitians will readily admit some taste vile so there is little help of children taking them and having a tube eliminates taste as an issue. In some ways though it highlights how important getting it right it. There is so little room for error with children, especially those in fragile health. We have been having a year-long dalliance with high calorie formula to meet Wriggles' weight needs and after having worked through much of the Paediasure range, seem to have it right. 

Recently though, I have been reading about blended diet which is much as it says on the tin. Real food, blended to go down the tube. Mostly, I am pretty at peace with Wriggles having formula albeit through a tube sticking out of her tummy-needs must and all that. She grows on formula. She develops on formula. She digests formula. A large part of me is apprehensive to rock the boat. Why change what works? I haven't yet spoken with a dietitian about it, but I suspect they will say the same. Formula comes with statistics. Formula has studies about it. Medical reports, numbers, averages, facts. Formula is easily measured, it is tailored down to the last 0.1ml. It has a neat little box on the label telling you all the information. I just have two little niggles that I want to at least experiment with or really look into:

1. Although medication seems to largely control Wriggles' reflux, it is far from going away and lying dormant for long, and when we do have flare ups they wreak absolute havoc. There are no formal studies about blended diet and reflux, but huge numbers of parent (and increasingly health professional) anecdotes are testimony to the fact that switching to a blended diet instead of formula can really improve on, if not eliminate the worst of reflux. This won't be true for all children and all diagnoses, but it is something I am very curious about. When we are in a good period, things are ok. When we are in a bad period, there is all manner of projectile vomiting, crying, coughing, gagging and there are still fears about aspirating on reflux. A very good reason for wanting it controlled a little more than it is now. I'd say it is about 70% controlled now. Not bad at all, but 30% is still too much for me especially when it involves dragging the respiratory system into review again and frankly, why would any child be motivated to eat when they are being sick?

2. That eating thing. Sometimes I feel it can be all I go on about, but really it is SUCH a big thing. So far, Wriggles shows no motivation for scoffing. None. What if, even partially, feeding her actual food down the tube stimulated something somewhere into encouraging her body to at least try? I'm not talking whole meals, just curiosity, tastes, most importantly a want to eat for herself. Not because I'm trying to bribe her by letting her holding my keys in exchange for licking a spoon but a desire to satiate the tastes, the smells, the textures. A number of parents have reported very favourable turn around in their children's attitudes to food since trying the blended diet. I know at one point, we will have to look at tube weaning. I have spent hours reading up on this to the wee small hours and am so torn by procedures and philosophies on it. Little of it sits entirely comfortably with me, yet. So what if something helped her there by her own accord first? Sometimes I think, well we've nothing to loose. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work. But you don't know without trying.

Really, blended diet should seem the most natural thing in the world. Humans are made to eat food by whatever means, yes? But the opposition towards blended diet is surprising. Few professionals recommend it, fewer support it. Our community nurse recently remarked another patient she sees has tried it; she did say that it was brilliant for reflux but that the parents did it out on a limb without positive backing. Pages could be written for or against. Feeding is such an emotive issue, from a personal, parental or professional point of view. Nutrition is the essentially the building blocks of life for a healthy future, simply put it must be gotten right. But it is also so easy to medicalise and forget the pleasure it brings to the giver and receiver. 

So I have been experimenting. Just a bit. Nothing radical.

I feel so naughty.

I keep expecting a dietitian or doctor to pop up screaming "PUT THAT SYRINGE DOOOOOWN!".

I knew I had become a bit institutionalised by our hospital history but was slightly taken aback.

I have my defence ready. "It's just a bit of porridge, guv." No. "For chrissakes it's just food." "She's my child!!!" "If she ate this with her mouth, you and I would be dancing a jig on the ceiling!" I think I might have over-thought this.

So far, I have only experimented with swapping one daytime bolus feed. I have kept the same calories and as near to the same volume. I haven't tried anything I wouldn't give her orally or any complex flavours. I just want to see how she responds to digesting anything but milk and the odd Quaver. We've only been doing it a week and I'm so far sitting on the fence as to if we carry this on or if we might be some of the lucky ones to reap results. But one thing, I can't begin to tell you the joy, the excitement of mixing porridge, of smelling real fruit, of looking at flavour, colours and smells. It excites me, putting it down the tube. It really makes me happy that it is real. 

It makes me hope that one day I will be making these concoctions not just for a tube and syringe. Maybe I need to get out more, maybe I need to stop looking so far ahead, maybe I need to stop caring about food...but for now, I'm just enjoying feeding my daughter a little more.





Wednesday, August 15

First Day

And so it starts. 

My new routine:

Lansoprozole MUPS 7.5mg dissolved in water, once a day
Domperidone 2.3ml three times a day
Co-Amoxiclav antibiotics 5ml twice a day until PEG operation (possibly to be replaced with a long term antibiotic post-operation)
Fluoxetine inhaler, one puff twice a day

4 x 100ml bolus feeds of Paediasure (1 calorie per ml) with a 10ml flush of sterile or cooled boiled water (10am, 1pm, 4pm, 7pm) each taking half an hour. Before each feed, the tube needs aspirating and the pH checking.
10 hour continous feed at night of Paediasure Plus (1.5ml calorie per ml) of 400ml at 40ml per hour. Flush in the morning (around 6am).

In one sense it is not too different from our old routine:

Baby gets up.
Baby gets me up.
Baby has bottle. Baby gets bored of bottle. Baby slowly has bottle over morning including lansoprozole sneaked in feed.
Baby has lunch.....etc
Baby goes to bed (fingers crossed).

Except it feels very different. For a start, there is a little machine which beeps at me. There is an awful lot of handwashing. Although the level of washing and sterilising is not too different, it feels different. Things are more regimented. There is a slightly draining feeling that I am a doing little too much jumping around fiddling with medical equipment rather than "mummying".

I know it is the first day.
I know it is bound to be tiring after a fortnight of emotional stress.
I know all this.
I know it is worth it.
I know it could be far far more complicated or stressful.

But I miss the simplicity of the old times. 

I am so grateful for the input of talented consultants who give a fig about making my daughter better not just not their profession or for her well being but mine also. I am so glad that at last someone has put their foot down and said that is enough frequenting of a&e. This is getting too silly and draining the quality of life for you both and should kickstart development sluggishness or address things better in terms of firming things up for the future.

It's just, without wanting to sound too much of a moany-guts, that I am sad it has to be this way. I am sad for my baby that she has lost so much babyish innocence and experienced so much so soon. I am sad for me that my first precious child differs so much from the promised ideal.

Saturday, July 21

Feeding update

Sod's Law dictates that whatever we want within a time frame will of course be denied. Probably to be fulfilled as soon as it is not relevant.

Since our appointment with the dietician and the fact although improving, Wriggles' oral aversion is not disappearing anytime soon, Wriggles has gone from being practically curious about meal times to back to square one: refusal. There I was a month ago, blethering on to lovely Ruth about the amazing progress and how proud I was, to have it all grind to a halt. Although she will consume or at least chew, very small amounts (I'm talking mouthfuls, or pieces the size of my fingernail constituting a "meal") of dry textures like corn and maize snacks or crispbread, these are so low in calories they are in dietary terms counterproductive. I have been frantic in trying to avoid getting a feeding tube but am slowly coming to be at peace with if we end up with one, we end up with one. 

Three weeks of ending up back at square one, encountering all-out refusal of any solids, difficulty feeding milk (our one and only source of calories and nutrition) and being back to all manner of tactics to get out of any feeding has made me feel a broken mama. Against all my wishes and attempts at it being otherwise, feeding in any situation now, including drinking which it never has been, is a battle of stubbornly massive proportions. It was never meant to be like this. I was trying to hard to teach enjoyment and acceptance and the opposite has happened. No 'usual' tricks work, and any former fail-safes have fallen. The progress we made painstakingly had been rapidly backtracked on through a combination of illness, teething, toddlerdom and the horrid beast that is oral aversion. 

Would I be far more patient if I wasn't on a time frame against tube feeding?

Maybe.

Then again, maybe not. I suspect any more patience, any more gaily aborting mealtimes in the face of tears and upset, any more tackling defiance, would only be the work of a saint. And I am not a saint. I, like many others out there, am a humble parent trying to do the best but sometimes that will be called into question.


There are two big things I have been thinking about recently. One, is something a doctor said to be in hospital, and one is a debate which I have read on many feeding blogs and in support and awareness groups.


1. "Is it ever 'right' to use a feeding tube for children?" mused the doctor to his students.

And as he followed up, yes, in many cases. In premature infants before they can suck or swallow and co-ordinate, in sick children who cannot feed, in children who for a vast array of reasons either cannot eat or drink or cannot co-ordinate, those with complex medical needs and those who do not tolerate a variety of feeding. What he was specifically addressing though, was FTT (Failure to Thrive) children. It is a tricky question, and one he admitted he sat on the fence about. Given that food is available, surely a child will not let himself actually starve or dehydrate? Would even the worst feeding disorder be conquered by approaching starvation and malnourishment? And on the other hand, is it more cruel to push a child to those extremities which may prove fruitless? What if by that point, the child's internal sensory and psychological hard wiring was so confused, that the same signals and reflexes did not register? A hard choice and not one to be taken lightly by parents or physicians. 



2. ...which lead on to "is it more cruel in either long or short term to keep pushing food as a primary source, or to rely on an invasive feeding tube to be able to let the child go at his own pace?"

Again, not easy to answer and one that ultimately will differ from each child, each situation, each paediatrician and each family. I have always been of the opinion that feeding tubes are a no-go zone. A last resort. Giving up. And then along came oral aversion, blighting our meal times. We have gone beyond toddler-tactics. Beyond baby book advice. Beyond crafting edible animals and such like out of lunch. Beyond trial and error. Beyond simple solutions. Beyond discipline. We are in a murky territory and more than it pains me to see Wriggles not eat, it pains me to see her unhappy. And sometimes, she is miserable around food. Actually, sometimes? A year ago, I thought I must be doing something wrong. That there must be something to change and it would all suddenly fall into place. It is frustrating, but I now know there is no suddenly. Yes, there are small victories and milestones that feel HUGE, but no sudden snap of the fingers. This is going to take time. More time and more patience that I ever envisaged. I must admit, I have begun to wonder if it is more harmful or hurtful to keep pushing constant feeding on her. When she does feed, it is so slow that it can be easy for one thing to run into the other. The only way to get a decent amount of calories (and nutrients) into her is to ensure she drinks at least 600ml of Paediasure Plus a day. This is no easy task. She struggles with large volumes, can take well over an hour to sink a bottle and becomes bored and upset easily. She still struggles with a strong gag reflex too, which all too often undoes the hard work of the previous hour. Would her quality of life be improved by allowing her more freedom, or would it be hampered with more medical intervention? I am not wholly sure I can answer that right now. Since switching from a peptide to this current milk, I think she has put on weight. I can see one less set of ribs at least. But if so, and if they quite happily drop the feeding tube shebang at the next review, what then? Do we just struggle on in vain? I am beginning to wonder if part of the problem is that the poor mite feels she is in her eyes, constantly being asked to feed, with little satisfying result. It is going to take a lot more than some simple distractions or super-yummy food to turn mealtimes into fun times. More than just trust. Is it fair to ask her to carry on like this? 


A lot of food (haha) for thought for this premmy mum.


13 months old in hospital, when there was a vague plan to place a permenant NG tube that got quashed at the last minute, two hours before discharge!